Here’s an excellent article about gun control and how invalid it is,
from the Nealz Nuz website ( http://www.boortz.com/nealznuz.htm )

(Discussing “West Wing” and how it should be renamed “Left Wing”, and the recent
show revealing who shot someone)
______________________________________________

Now the truth of the matter is scientific research shows that crimes – hundreds
of thousands of crimes – are prevented every year in this country because
victims are carrying guns. It happens every 13 seconds.

This takes up a bit of space, but I’ll print another quote here. This one is
from Marvin Wolfgang, the late Director of the Sellin Center for Studies in
Criminology and Criminal Law at the University of Pennsylvania,

“I am as strong a gun-control advocate as can be found among the criminologists
in this country. If I were Mustapha Mond of Brave New World, I would eliminate
all guns from the civilian population and maybe even from the police … What
troubles me is the article by Gary Kleck and Marc Gertz. ["Armed Resistance to
Crime: The Prevalence and Nature of Self-Defense with a Gun," by Gary Kleck and
Marc Gertz, published in that same issue of The Journal of Criminal Law &
Criminology] The reason I am troubled is that they have provided an almost clear
cut case of methodologically sound research in support of something I have
theoretically opposed for years, namely, the use of a gun in defense against a
criminal perpetrator. …I have to admit my admiration for the care and caution
expressed in this article and this research. Can it be true that about two
million instances occur each year in which a gun was used as a defensive measure
against crime? It is hard to believe. Yet, it is hard to challenge the data
collected. We do not have contrary evidence. The National Crime Victim Survey
does not directly contravene this latest survey, nor do the Mauser and Hart
Studies. … the methodological soundness of the current Kleck and Gertz study
is clear. I cannot further debate it. … The Kleck and Gertz study impresses me
for the caution the authors exercise and the elaborate nuances they examine
methodologically. I do not like their conclusions that having a gun can be
useful, but I cannot fault their methodology. They have tried earnestly to meet
all objections in advance and have done exceedingly well.”

(The Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, Northwestern University School of
Law, Volume 86, Number 1, Fall, 1995)

So — measure the statement from Criminologist Marvin Wolfgang to the bleatings
fo the fictional press secretary on The West Wing. What do you have? You have
an AGENDA, that’s what you have. You have the Hollywood left pushing it’s
illogical and non-factual anti-gun agenda on the viewers of it’s “fictional”
television show.

If these leftist idiots think we’re all safer walking around without the most
effective means of self defense possible, then why aren’t they wearing “I’m
unarmed” buttons? Freakin’ jerks.
_____________________________________________