—– Original Message —–
From: Mitch Vilos
To: Mitch Vilos
Sent: Friday, September 03, 2004 12:25 AM
Subject: FW: WHY TERRORISTS DON’T ATTACK ISRAELI SCHOOLS

If the U had a terrorist attack on it w/ “assault rifles” it would blame innocent gun owners who own assault rifles. Why must we be constantly tormented by backward thinking liberals? Why can’t they all just move to Canada? Pancho V.

——————————————————————————–
From: [email protected] [[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2004 2:26 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: WHY TERRORISTS DON’T ATTACK ISRAELI SCHOOLS

18 months ago I published an article entitled “Israel: Guns for Defense Against Terrorism” in a gun magazine. The following excerpts are relevant to the current hostage crisis in a Russian school,

Some weeks before this was written (in August, 2002) Palestinians broke into an Israeli settlement, knocked an unarmed mother to the ground and forced her to watch while they killed her baby and two older children. Then they killed her before being themselves routed by belatedly arriving armed civilians.

This is, incidentally, a matter of deliberate policy, not just of idiosyncratic sadism. The theory is that by killing children, especially in front of their parents, Palestinians maximize the chance of terrorizing the Jews. Also such attacks initially seemed a low-risk strategy: Small children can’t shoot back. So when Arafat’s and other Palestinian terror groups started out over thirty years ago their first targets were schools and school buses.

But Israel’s response has been that at least some teachers in each school are armed. Likewise, bus drivers are issued guns and-or encouraged to carry their private firearms, and at least one armed teacher or parent must ride along on every school field trip. By arming teachers to stave off terror attackers until security forces (who patrol near schools) arrive Israel has deterred Palestinian school attacks for the last 30 years.

It works even on today’s suicide terrorists. While willing to die, they still avoid schools lest they be shot down before they can kill the children. It is easier to kill in places and circumstances where strangers are allowed entrance rather than barred, as illustrated by a May 31, 2002 incident reported by the Israeli news service Arutz Sheva: “At about 8:30 AM, [a Palestinian terrorist entered the town of Shavei Shomron, opened] fire and threw at least one grenade at the kindergarten before setting off on a shooting spree through the town. He opened fire at several residents and homes before David Elbaz, owner of the local mini-market, gave chase and killed him with gunshots. In addition to several grenades and the [rifle] the terrorist carried on him, security sweeps revealed several explosive devices that he had intended to detonate during the thwarted attack.”

Note that he did NOT try to enter the school. That would have required that he successfully shoot it out with school personnel in order to get into a position to set off his bombs. (A few days before, a suicide terrorist was killed by a teacher before he could harm anyone.)