Armed Citizens Can Defuse Terrorist Threat
Armed Citizens Can Defuse Terrorist Threat
Armed citizens can defuse terrorist threat
By John R. Lott Jr.
Armed private citizens in some heavily Jewish areas of Brooklyn,
N.Y., started patrolling their neighborhoods this past weekend. Some
carried baseball bats or cellphones. Others had concealed handguns or
shotguns.
Why such unusual behavior?
Many Brooklyn Jews were alarmed by a CBS 60 Minutes report on June 2
that the terrorists who targeted the World Trade Center in 1993 first
planned to blow up Jewish neighborhoods in Brooklyn. The terrorists
apparently switched to the trade center only because they believed
that most of its occupants were Jewish. A terrorist interviewed by
CBS gave the impression that Brooklyn Jews were still a prime target.
Rabbi Yakove Lloyd, founder of the Jewish Defense Group, which helped
organize the armed patrols, says they ”will be a very effective
deterrent against terrorism directed at American Jews and other
targets.” But to many Americans, such behavior is more frightening
than the threat of terrorism.
The FBI conducted almost 470,000 more background checks for gun
purchases during the six months after Sept. 11 than during the same
six-month period a year earlier. These new gun owners, claim
columnists such as Nicholas Kristof at The New York Times, were not
only useless in stopping terrorism, but probably would cause more
deaths with their guns.
Lessons from Israel
These Brooklyn Jews can point to Israel to counter such criticism.
Israeli Police Inspector General Shlomo Aharonisky has repeatedly
called on all concealed-handgun-permit holders to carry firearms at
all times. In March, Israeli police announced they wanted to increase
the number of Israelis carrying handguns by 60,000.
”There’s no question that weapons in the hands of the public have
prevented acts of terror or stopped them while they were in
progress,” Aharonisky says.
Examples this year:
* A woman shot a terrorist twice in the head before he could set off
a bomb in a supermarket.
* A man at a disco shot to death a Palestinian who had started firing
a machine gun.
* A private security guard saved hundreds by shooting a terrorist
before he could drive his car bomb into a disco.
* A grocer fatally shot a terrorist armed with grenades, ”explosive
devices” and a machine gun.
Police won’t step up protection
Some New York City Jews, concerned about civilians running around
with guns, are not supporting the patrols. Their reaction would be
more understandable if the police were willing to provide additional
protection. But despite concerns voiced by Lloyd and local
politicians that there is not adequate protection, the police have
not publicly offered more help. Instead, New York City Police
Commissioner Ray Kelly said last week that police would not tolerate
people ”brandishing weapons under the guise of protecting others”
and that ”anyone attempting to patrol the streets armed with a
weapon” would be arrested.
The biggest practical problem with the patrols is that they will not
operate on Saturdays, the Sabbath. Except in emergencies, Orthodox
Jews are banned from even touching guns on holidays and the Sabbath.
But everyone recognizes that synagogues could be targets of terror
attacks. The unfortunate irony is that to the extent that the armed
patrols deter attacks on other days, being disarmed during the
Sabbath actually encourages attacks to take place then.
Recognizing this problem, Israel’s rabbis this year agreed to allow
some armed worshipers in synagogues there during Passover and on the
Sabbath.
Given New York City’s stringent gun-ownership rules, those who carry
guns during the patrols are surely among the most law-abiding
citizens. It takes six months or more to get a gun; so they hardly
ran out and bought one right after 60 Minutes. Those who have a
permit to carry a concealed handgun have had extensive police
scrutiny. And despite Kelly’s warning, it is lawful for city gun
owners to carry their unloaded shotguns in enclosed cases.
City police seem more concerned about monitoring law-abiding citizens
than in protecting them. If the Second Amendment means anything,
surely it applies in such a case as this.
John R. Lott Jr., an American Enterprise Institute resident scholar,
wrote More Guns, Less Crime.