“Hunting licence fees in the U.S. alone amount to $2.4 billion a year,”

Hunters defend their turf at CITES meet
By Ed Stoddard
06 Oct 2004 09:35:40 GMT
Source: Reuters
http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/BKK73408.htm

BANGKOK, Oct 6 (Reuters) – The fur can really fly at big conservation
meetings where hunters rub shoulders with animal welfare activists who
dismiss blood sports as cruel.

But hunters are defending their turf at a meeting in Thailand on the
Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES), arguing
that much of the cash spent by their fraternity goes to conservation.
“In the United States, licencing fees and special excise tax on hunting
equipment provides 70 to 80 percent of the conservation revenue for
state agencies,” said John Jackson, the chairman of Conservation Force,
a coalition of hunting groups. “Hunting licence fees in the U.S. alone
amount to $2.4 billion a year,” he said on the sidelines of the two-week
meeting in Bangkok on Wednesday.

CITES regulates the global trade in wild animals and plants. Some of the
animals in question, such as leopards and black rhinos, will meet their
end from a hunter’s bullet.

Big-game hunters with deep pockets are celebrating a CITES decision on
Monday to lift a ban on hunting the rare black rhino in Namibia and
South Africa — a move some say is too early as the lumbering beast’s
numbers are still recovering.

Both countries say funds raised will be used for conservation projects.

Many conservationists are opposed to hunting on grounds of cruelty and
say that wildlife watching and other forms of eco-tourism can generate
more revenue.

Japanese efforts to lift a moratorium on whaling and to ease controls on
trade in the animal’s products are often countered by assertions from
the green lobby that whale watching generates up to $1 billion annually.

Hunters insist they also use natural resources “sustainably” — a
buzzword at such meetings — and that without them many species would be
in graver danger. “In reality, if you don’t use it, you lose it,” said
Jackson. “We give wildlife a value,” he said, referring to the monetary
incentive to conserve rare species.

Others at the conference agreed there were benefits from the legal
hunting industry — as opposed to the illegal one, which seen is as a
major threat to many endangered species, including tigers and monkeys.

“Hunting is an important source of conservation revenue both from
licence fees and associated economic benefits for rural communities,”
said David Brackett, the head of Canada’s delegation to the meeting.
“We see economic benefits in many rural communities,” he said.