NO MORE VICTIMLESS CRIME LAWS!
The most fundamental principle of moral law is that of punishing only those who initiate the use of force or fraud to violate the inalienable individual right to life and property of other human beings.

The idea of separating the instruments, substances or methodologies used to violate the rights of others is a criminal conspiracy, of, by and for lawyers to multiply victimless crime laws for profit of the legal profession.

For example:

The instrument, substance or methodology used to criminally violate other human beings right to life or property should not be a matter of property concern. i.e.,

1. In the case of robbery: It matters not to the victim whether the criminal used a rock, baseball bat, automobile, rifle, pistol, shotgun, stick, shovel or any other item to commit the act of robbery, the only fact that should be considered is that of the criminal initiating the use of force to violate the right of the victim.

2. In the case of murder: It is of no consequence to family or friends what instrument,
substance or methodology was used to commit the murder. The only consideration should be the fact that the criminal initiated the use of force to violate the right to life of the victim. The degree of force in terms of torture and suffering of the victim should be a
consideration for termination of the life of the criminal(s).

3. In the case of rape, it is of no consequence to the victim what means of force was used by the criminal. The only consideration should be proof that the criminal raped the victim.

The body of law I refer to as VICTIMLESS CRIME LAWS, includes the 20,000 plus so-called GUN LAWS now on the books which are presumptive.. i.e., suppositive and operate on the presumption or supposition that an individual possessing a substance, (including poison, medicine, household chemicals, gasoline, fertilizer, etc), or an inanimate object such as a tire-iron, blow-gun, baseball bat, automobile, hatchet, knife, sword, meat cleaver, shotgun, rifle, pistol, cane, monkey-wrench, etc MIGHT use the same for some criminal purpose and must be punished for having it, whether using it for such a purpose or not~!

VICTIMLESS CRIME LAWS are inimical to the very concept of the Constitution, and if the Supreme Court of the United States Of America were doing their job, they would strike down all victimless crime laws for that purpose without any further consideration, and replace them with a single law:
========================================================================
No human being has the right to initiate the use of force or fraud to violate the inalienable, individual right to life and property of any other human being, and when any individual does so, he or she becomes a criminal to that extent having stepped outside the province of civilized behavior where the intended victim may use retaliatory force to whatever level may be required to maintain his or her right to life inviolate against criminal aggression. Including lethal force when necessary to use it.
=========================================================================
The justification for the moral right to use retaliatory force against criminal aggression is based on the fact that “The Right To Life presupposes the right to self-defense to maintain one’s inalienable individual right to life and property inviolate against criminal agression” The right to property that an individual has purchased, traded for or created is also presupposed by the right to life. i.e., without personal property (food, clothing etc) it is not possible to sustain life.

Consider the fact that not a single one of the more than 20,000 so-called gun laws has ever prevented a single act of murder, robbery or rape by psychopathic criminals (and never will)! The emphasis should not be on making more victimless crime laws which have not worked in the past, do not work now and will not work in the future.

The emphasis should be to REPEAL ALL VICTIMLESS CRIME LAWS. Get rid of the entire lot of 20,000 gun laws and replace those laws with a single law such as I have stated hereinbefore. The advantage is that everyone including the 800,000+ lawyers, judges and politicans would be able to understand “the law”, and apply it uniformly.

Sometimes I wonder about the mothers who were emotionally whipped into a frenzy by the distortions of the $275,000+ salaried Brady Bunch Leader who did so with fraudulent statistics and in ignorance of the causes of injury and death which really need attention in the United States.

Where would you put the priority when considering that when we had 1,632 Hunting injuries, there were 327,600 baseball injuries, 460,420 basketball injuries, 525,026 bicycling injuries, 66,605 fishing injuries, 323,112 football injuries, 99,161 swimming injuries, 21,828 water skiing injuries.

Would you consider closing down all of the above sporting activities, confiscating all of the equipment used, making victimless crime laws to criminalize becoming active in any of said sports?

And what about the tens of thousands of items in grocery stores, drug stores, gas stations, hardware stores where the “wherewithall” to make weapons is there for the purchase price, and substances from those sources or under your kitchen sink, in your garage storage area or garden cabinet which if inhaled, drank or improperly used can produce virtually instant death or disablement.. Do you want everyone to be licensed who has such inventory for destruction on their premises. Do we need individual home inspectors to check for violations? Think about it!

Then….how many more boondogglers will we have to put on the federal, state, county and city payrolls to do the record keeping, the inspections.. the invasion into our homes and lives? Who will pay for it…!

One of the first questions you should consider asking whenever anyone comes to you with a plea for the government to do more is: ‘AT WHO’S EXPENSE”… the answer that will be evated by the politicians… is “you .. you fools”….. i.e., “TANSTAAFL”! You will pay for it and the infrastructure they build and self-perpetuate with it.

Wake-up! Pull our your copy of Shapespere’s Henry VI Part 2 and witness:
“Dick the Butcher– Cade the Rebel”…….”Dick (shouts) “The first think we do, let’s kill all the lawyers.”

You understand of course that “if the Supreme Court were to do its duty, they would strike-down” all Victimless Crime Law, and that act alone would “kill all the lawyers”…. well, maybe not all of them because there are some fine ones, but it would un-employ about 75% of them who are ‘warts on the ass of progress’ and would be unecessary after strike-down of all victimless crime laws.

If I have turned-on a light.. keep it burning! We do not need more government, we need less government. We would not have to build more prisons, if all victimless crime laws were struck-down. Probably half of the present prison population did no physical violence to another human being, but are in prison for CRIMES when there were NO VICTIMS.

Think about the fact that “there are no crimes against society”.. i.e., explain to me how you can injure or murder a society…. It is not society but solitary individuals who are injured or murdered. Society is a group of individuals living in proximity to each other in some socio-economic context. Rights pertain to individual human beings..not to groups as a whole.

Write to your “alleged leaders” and demand they not only repeal the 20,000 victimless crime gun laws, and focus their legislation on punishing criminals who violate the rights of other human beings.. by force or fraud. Keep the focus on their showing proof of the efficacy of the laws to deal with criminal who use force, not on restricting our Constitution 2nd Amendment Rights…. then we will start making progress!

ROBERT INGRAM POWELL
DR. ROBERT INGRAM POWELL, Ph.D.
[email protected]